Robbie Keane’s exit helps Harry Redknapp solve Spurs striker surplus

• New Celtic striker was ‘Mr Angry’ when out of team
• Spurs manager has only two forwards for FA Cup replay

Robbie Keane’s move to Celtic means Harry Redknapp has only two strikers available for tomorrow’s FA Cup fourth-round replay against Leeds United at Elland Road, but the Tottenham manager said that the Republic of Ireland international’s loan deal has saved him from a greater problem in the long run.

Redknapp said it was difficult to tell whether his team’s attacking strength had been improved by the departure of Keane and the arrival of Eidur Gudjohnsen but he felt he had at least one striker too many once it became clear that Roman Pavlyuchenko was staying.

“Pavlyuchenko wouldn’t have gone to Birmingham or Stoke but Robbie was desperate to go and play for Celtic,” he said. “It solved a problem for me as well.”

Keane’s desperation to move to a club he supported as a boy – just 12 months after he returned to Tottenham from another of his childhood teams, Liverpool – stemmed from his falling behind Jermain Defoe, Peter Crouch and Pavlyuchenko in the White Hart Lane pecking order. Defoe and Crouch will start against Leeds because Pavlyuchenko has a groin problem and Gudjohnsen played today in a friendly against Dagenham & Redbridge.

Keane, who has scored only one league goal since getting four in the 5-0 rout of Burnley in September, is expected to return to north London in the summer: “I would be surprised if Celtic have the money to buy him,” said Redknapp, who believes that the former Chelsea and Barcelona forward Gudjohnsen gives him greater options than the disaffected Ireland captain, whom he described as “Mr Angry” when he is not playing.

“It would have been a problem for Robbie, he wouldn’t have been happy not playing. Crouchy and Defoe have done well and I’ve got Eidur Gudjohnsen who can do the same job. He plays the same type of role as Robbie and he can also play in midfield for me.”

Keane’s departure will be felt in the dressing room, according to Redknapp, who has handed the captaincy to Michael Dawson for tomorrow in the absence of Ledley King. The manager had no hesitation in giving the armband to Dawson at a time when Fabio Capello is deciding whether to strip John Terry of the England captaincy following allegations about the Chelsea defender’s private life.

“I don’t want to second-guess what the England manager is going to do, I’m sure he will make his own decision” said Redknapp. “But there have to be standards. Footballers are young men but they are role models and they are setting examples to kids out there – and they have to set the right examples.

Tottenham HotspurHarry RedknappTransfer windowPremier LeagueFA CupMikey Staffordguardian.co.uk

The pain and peril of being an undercover Leeds United fan | Rob Bagchi

Having to sit there and soak up the home supporters’ abuse can make you feel more partisan than if you were among your own

A consummate lack of organisation and the triumph of amnesia over experience have often left me on the morning of a Leeds away game with a ticket among the home supporters as my only method of going to the match. I know it’s not really the done thing and indeed one of my friends would rather bail out than have to sit on his hands all afternoon but when it came to last week’s FA Cup tie at White Hart Lane, squirreling myself among the Spurs fans still seemed a far more attractive prospect than not going at all and watching it on television.

It can be an unsettling experience for the uninitiated, particularly when the atmosphere was as robustly “old school” as last Saturday’s. The first hurdle is the walk to the ground, where the paranoia that you may get found out mingles with the even more unpalatable notion that the fans of your own side will mistake you for one of the opposition. Perhaps this is why some insist on having a secret sign about their person, the pin badge on the underside of the lapel that can be quickly flashed to save your skin if your assailant is particularly hawk-eyed, or a specific signal such as the Leeds salute.

It is inside the stadium, though, that the real mental torture begins. There is an etiquette involved and its first principle is to look as nondescript as possible. It still amazes me that certain naïve and wildly Utopian supporters will deck themselves in their club colours despite standing out like a zebra among a pride of lions. If they are shrewd or cunning enough to take a child with them as a shield to deter the milder elements from having a go at them they may well get away with it. But by and large, especially if your side does not lie down and lose and thus allow the opposition fans the opportunity to patronise the youngster and perhaps even ruffle their hair, it is not the wisest approach. Besides, kids can slow you down when you’ve got to make a run for it.

I would suggest that singing is a taboo, too. When a Forest fan of my acquaintance got Stretford End tickets for himself and his rather less worldly father at Old Trafford, his dad responded to a song alluding to Stuart Pearce’s penalty miss at Italia 90 during the warm-up by breaking into the “Psycho” chorus and wondered why he spent the next two hours getting pelted in the back of the head by scrunched-up fag packets and pie foils, while his son speculated loudly on whether he had in fact been adopted.

The best policy is to sit there in silence, staring resolutely ahead and trying to stifle the instinctive twitching and tensing of your body as the game progresses. Most poker players have “tells”, slight, involuntary changes to their demeanour that betray the state of their hands. Even when marooned in potentially hostile territory and perennially on guard to the dangers of the sort of subtle trap that did for Gordon Jackson in the Great Escape, football fans are the same and can give themselves away by the inopportune dropping of their shoulders or the clenching of their fists and the constant muttering under their breath.

So long as you act subdued and throttle the inclination to say something, you should generally be OK but the way you behave when there’s a goal for your side will always carry the threat of unmasking you as a fifth columnist. I find loudly berating the defence for some perceived lapse is a good outlet for the adrenaline but there is always someone hard or drunk enough or too daft to come in out of the rain, who cannot help himself and celebrates. If you are lucky enough to be at a ground in London this usually provokes some choice Guy Ritchie-style phrases involving “our manor”, “facking liberties”, “norvern scum”, followed by finger-pointing and entreaties to stewards and police to do something about it.

At White Hart Lane after Tottenham had retaken the lead, 30,000 fans sang “Wanker, what’s the score?” at the twerp on the Shelf who had leapt to his feet when Leeds first equalised. Part of me hopes there was a lone voice crying “2-2″ in the wilderness in the 95th minute when Jermaine Beckford converted the penalty but I suspect he was either unconscious, long gone or had belatedly made the equation between discretion and self-preservation.

Because you have to sit there and soak up the home supporters’ abuse towards your team it can make you feel even more partisan than if you were among your own. The right result makes it an invigorating experience and probably heightens the celebration by the time you reach sanctuary. It cannot replace being part of an identifiable group and being allowed safely to act the goat to your heart’s content but even with its constraints it is better to be there undercover than not at all.

Leeds UnitedTottenham HotspurFA CupRob Bagchiguardian.co.uk

Harry Redknapp says tax evasion charge will not affect Tottenham

• Redknapp charged with two counts of cheating the public purse
• ‘I know I have done nothing wrong,’ says Tottenham manager

Harry Redknapp has insisted that the Crown Prosecution Service’s decision to charge him with tax evasion will have no bearing on his work at Tottenham Hotspur. Redknapp has been charged with two counts of cheating the public revenue, and voluntarily attended Bishopsgate police station in London yesterday to be charged by police after an exhaustive 26-month inquiry into alleged corruption in English football.

“This is not a football-related matter so I have no intention of letting it distract me at all from what I am doing and intend to do at the club,” Redknapp told the Daily Mail. “This all dates back to 2002, so it has been going on far too long. It is farcical.

“I have issued a statement. I know I have done nothing wrong, I’ve been saying it for a long time, but the matter is in the hands of solicitors so I have nothing more to say about this.”

Redknapp was accused of a £40,000 evasion by the Crown Prosecution Service. His lawyer Ian Burton, of BurtonCopeland, said: “The £40,000 figure is our estimate.”

Redknapp, who vehemently denies any wrongdoing, has previously dismissed the investigation as “not a major issue”. Tottenham have promised to stand by their manager and offer him their support.

The former Portsmouth chairman, Milan Mandaric, had the same charge levelled at him by the Crown Prosecution Service on Tuesday which he strenuously denied.

Harry RedknappTottenham HotspurPortsmouthPremier LeaguePaolo Bandiniguardian.co.uk