Jamie O’Hara: I don’t want to go back and sit on Tottenham’s bench

• Jamie O’Hara does not want to play ‘one in six’ games
• Will ask Redknapp if the manager wants to offload him

Jamie O’Hara fears his return to Tottenham Hotspur next season could be short-lived as he refuses to settle for a place on Harry Redknapp’s bench.

The midfielder has thrived during his season-long loan at Portsmouth, establishing himself as the first name on the manager Avram Grant’s teamsheet and being voted as the club’s player of the year by nine different supporters’ groups.

He will go back to White Hart Lane after Saturday’s FA Cup final against Chelsea, for which he is a selection doubt because of two stress fractures in his lower back, but he cannot accept a return to the status of bit-part player even though his worth may be increased by his versatility to play on the left.

Redknapp, the Tottenham manager, will need greater depth to his squad next season as he takes the club into the Champions League for the first time. O’Hara’s worth might be increased by his versatility; he can also play at left midfield or even left-back.

But the 23-year-old worries that Tottenham are well stocked in these areas. Redknapp’s options in central midfield comprise Tom Huddlestone, Wilson Palacios, Luka Modric and Jermaine Jenas, while Sandro, the young Brazil international, will join in the summer. Modric can also play on the left flank, where Redknapp has Gareth Bale, Niko Kranjcar and Danny Rose while at left-back, together with Bale, there is Benoît Assou-Ekotto.

“There are already five or six great central midfield players at Spurs and the manager may bring some more in,” said O’Hara. “Spurs have done fantastically this year so it is going to be difficult for me to get in the team. I will just have to sit down with Harry and see what he wants to do with me, whether he wants to offload me to somewhere else or if he wants to keep me.

“I have tasted first-team football now and I would not want to go back to sitting on the bench and playing one match in six. You can’t just come in and have one game in six if you want to play at the top level. I have come to Portsmouth and had a great season personally, so hopefully this can be a stepping stone to go on to better things.”

O’Hara, a boyhood Tottenham fan, managed to ruffle a few feathers back at White Hart Lane when he said that he wanted the team to lose to Fulham in their FA Cup quarter-final replay. Portsmouth had been drawn to face the winners and O’Hara knew that the terms of his loan would preclude him from playing in a semi-final against Tottenham.

Redknapp publicly ticked him off for his comments but, after Tottenham won and O’Hara found himself in the TV studio for the Wembley semi-final as a pundit, he again said that he wanted Spurs to lose as he was a professional and Portsmouth was his current club.

“I am not bothered about going back to Spurs as any issues arising from my comments have been swept under the bridge,” said O’Hara. “I have spoken to Harry and he is fine with it. When I spoke to him, he said, ‘You are young and I know you want to play in a Cup final but you have to be careful’. Maybe that is something I have got to learn but I see myself as an honest footballer and I was speaking my mind.”

O’Hara could be forgiven for feeling that he is jinxed at Wembley. He was dropped by the then Tottenham manager Juande Ramos for the 2008 Carling Cup final victory over Chelsea, despite having featured in the first-leg of the semi-final against Arsenal while last season, after Tottenham again reached the final of the competition, he missed a penalty in the shoot-out defeat to Manchester United.

“If we are going to beat Chelsea, we are just going to have to play out of our skins and ride our luck a bit,” O’Hara said. “We are probably going to need Chelsea to have an off-day – maybe they might have a hangover from winning the Premier League. But on our day, we can beat anyone. We have put in great performances this year.”ends

Tottenham HotspurPortsmouthDavid Hytnerguardian.co.uk

Jamie O’Hara may play in FA Cup final with double stress fracture

• O’Hara has two fractures of the lower spine
• Midfielder still hopes to play for Portsmouth at Wembley

Jamie O’Hara has a big decision to make as a stress fracture in his back threatens to rule him out of Portsmouth’s FA Cup final date with Chelsea at Wembley on Saturday.

The on-loan Tottenham Hotspur midfielder, who was ineligible for the semi-final win over his parent club, needed a painkilling injection to take part in the Premier League loss at Everton yesterday.

The 23-year-old, however, does not want to risk either the team’s chances or his own long-term health.

“I have got two fractures on the lower part of my spine and if it was any other time of the season, it is eight weeks out,” he said. “After this I will be out for a couple of months, and then it will just be rest because it is a stress fracture.

“We have had a scan already, and Spurs are looking towards a longer-term injury. Speaking to the doctors, it can be a serious one if you keep playing on it, and you could be looking at a year out.

“I have got to be careful what I do, but with the injections, the doctors said one more game would not be a problem.

“I would love to play, but it has come to the point now where I am really struggling and can’t do anything, which is the most frustrating thing. I can get around, but it is not how you want to be going into a Cup final.”

O’Hara added: “I have been speaking to Spurs and they are not wanting to stop me in any way, but are looking at it longer-term going back. I am going to miss some of pre-season, and will be trying to get myself right for the start.”

O’Hara collected a clean sweep of Portsmouth’s player of the season awards but does not want to see his last appearance made for all the wrong reasons.

“I have had a great season, winning all those awards, and I would not want to go into such a massive game for the club half-fit,” he said. “On a personal basis, it is great playing at Wembley and would be an occasion, but I don’t want to kill myself long-term. The final decision will be mine with the manager. We will have to sit down at the end of the week and decide what we want to do.”

PortsmouthTottenham HotspurFA Cupguardian.co.uk

Tottenham Hotspur confirm Portsmouth’s £1m Asmir Begovic debt

• Spurs owed seven-figure sum after goalkeeper joined Stoke
• Club keen to ‘assist Portsmouth with their financial difficulties’

Tottenham Hotspur have confirmed they are owed £1m by Portsmouth over the non-transfer of the goalkeeper Asmir Begovic. The scale of Portsmouth’s financial mismanagement was laid bare in detail yesterday as the club’s administrators revealed debts totalling £119m.

The south coast club owe Spurs £1m after the proposed joint transfer of Younes Kaboul and Begovic to White Hart Lane fell through and the latter instead chose to join Stoke. With Begovic never having been a Tottenham player, Spurs said the £1m amounts to compensation for the failure of the transfer.

The statement on the club’s website said: “The club can confirm that it has invoiced Portsmouth for £1m in respect of the failure of the joint transfer of Younes Kaboul and Asmir Begovic to Spurs and in accordance with the agreement of 30 January 2010 between both clubs.

“The statement contained within the administrator’s report released yesterday that it relates to a sell-on fee for Begovic is inaccurate, as is the statement that the player was registered with Tottenham Hotspur Football Club.

“Our original agreement with Portsmouth was for the purchase of two players for a combined, agreed price. The transfer of Younes Kaboul was completed and Portsmouth pressed for an immediate payment to alleviate their cashflow situation. We were assured that the transfer of Begovic would be completed before the end of the transfer window.

“To assist Portsmouth with their financial difficulties we paid Portsmouth an agreed sum of money, whilst at the same time concluding an agreement that, should Begovic be sold or loaned to any club other than ourselves, we would be repaid the sum of £1m.

“Portsmouth were keen to openly and freely agree to this surety. Our intention had been to assist a fellow club in financial difficulties whilst at the same time protecting our commercial position. We shall continue to do the latter and trust that this statement clarifies the position.”

PortsmouthTottenham HotspurBusinessPremier Leagueguardian.co.uk